How to Deal with Undesirables

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Wednesday, 30th December 2015
How to deal with undesirables

Advice on the gentlemanly art of umbrella combat from the late and lamented Kingsman agent Harry (Galahad) Hart.

Posted in Antagonistics, Pop-culture | Comments Off on How to Deal with Undesirables

“The Anti-Hooligan: Self-Defence as a Fine Art” (1902)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Wednesday, 13th January 2016

This short article from the London Daily News of Wednesday, October 29, 1902, offers a picturesque description of the Vigny stick fighting style in action, underscoring the central importance of agile, deceptive attacks and defences from the double-handed guard and also the frequent use of the butt end of the cane in delivering close-combat attacks.

Last night, at his School of Arms at 18, Berners-street, Professor Pierre Vigny gave a striking exhibition of the possibilities of self-defence afforded by a simple walking-stick. In these days, when the papers are full of “Hooligan” outrages, some such easy form of protection is by many considered almost necessary for late wayfarers.

Holding a malacca cane by one hand at each end, the Professor calmly awaited the onslaught of a skilled opponent with a similar stick. The spectator never knew which hand was to deal the blow, the released end moving with lightning speed, and a short hold was taken, so that the assailant, in guarding against an impending blow, often found himself hammered or prodded with the butt.

Then came an exhibition of stick swinging in which every part of the body was protected on all sides. With a perpetual loud hum, the cane made circles, in front and behind, so that no-one could reach within the guard without instantly receiving a blow that would shatter any bone to pieces.

After this the Professor showed the spectators how to take a knife or dagger from an advancing assailant. It looked so simple that one had to be assured that the trick really wanted learning.

And then, with the amateur heavyweight champion, Mr. Frank Parkes, the Professor showed his skill at boxing and the French system of boxing with both hands and feet, “la savate”.

With a sprinkling of people about who had learned Professor Vigny’s system, the Hooligan would soon find his occupation gone.

Posted in Exhibitions, Vigny stick fighting | Comments Off on “The Anti-Hooligan: Self-Defence as a Fine Art” (1902)

Have at you, Sir!

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Tuesday, 26th January 2016
Garvey

Instructor James Garvey (right) demonstrates the entry into a canonical Bartitsu takedown technique.

Posted in Canonical Bartitsu, Vigny stick fighting | Comments Off on Have at you, Sir!

The Moriarty Variations at “Sherlock Seattle”

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Wednesday, 27th January 2016

What if, during their fatal combat at the brink of the Reichenbach Falls, both Sherlock Holmes and Professor Moriarty had been trained in Bartitsu and armed with walking sticks? What if the evil professor had, in fact, drawn a knife on Holmes, as represented in Alan Moore’s League of Extraordinary Gentlemen?

SCEME 1

These and other scenarios were explored by intrepid members of BWAHAHAHA (the Barton-Wright/Alfred Hutton Alliance for Historically Accurate Hoplology and Antagonistics) for the edification of the audience at the 2016 Sherlock Seattle convention:

SCEME 2
Posted in Exhibitions, Sherlock Holmes | Comments Off on The Moriarty Variations at “Sherlock Seattle”

A Report on the 2015 UKBA Bartitsu Gathering

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Wednesday, 3rd February 2016

A report on the recent UKBA Bartitsu Gathering via http://ordinaryvisionary.tumblr.com:

ukba gathering

“Organised by the Bartitsu Irregulars, the Bartitsu club I (very) irregularly attend, the Bartitsu Gathering kicked off Sunday morning in Basingstoke and it included three seminars and sparring time.

The seminars were:

Kenton Clarke-Williams (Basingstoke Bartitsu Irregulars) – Everything but the Cane: unarmed techniques in cane fighting.

Peter Smallridge (Basingstoke Bartitsu Irregulars) – Punching in Pajamas: using grips to enhance striking for counter-grappling.

Sam Wigand (Metropolitan Bartitsu Club): – Beating the Unarmed Man: self defence with a cane against an unarmed attacker.

I really enjoyed all.

Hungry for unarmed knowledge as I always am, it’s no surprise I enjoyed the first two. The first looked at unarmed techniques vs an opponent armed with a cane, the second was grappler vs striker with the emphasis on the striker, which I found refreshingly unusual. You tend to hear more the other way around. Both seminars reminded me of techniques I learn in traditional Jujitsu, so that was excellent cross training for me. The third seminar was basically the opposite of the first, cane techniques vs unarmed opponent. I’m normally not so much into sticks but the cane’s the iconic Bartitsu tool so after incidentally learning a little bit here and a little bit there about it over time, it’s starting to grow on me and Sam Wigand did a good job in keeping the seminar fun and interesting.

Even the M25 cooperated to make it a good Sunday, no queues going up to Basingstoke, which might well be a first. The only downside of the day for me has been attending with a still sore big bruise I got competing in Longsword in Helsinki a week ago. It is exactly in the spot of my left arm that I need to block and break fall with. It annoyed me to no end in drilling and though I managed to have a go at sparring with sticks and a little wrestle, it really prevented me from enjoying the free sparring time more, as I would normally do.

Other than that, a good way to spend my Sunday at a well put together event. Well done to all involved!”

Posted in Antagonistics, Boxing, Canonical Bartitsu, Jiujitsu, Seminars | Comments Off on A Report on the 2015 UKBA Bartitsu Gathering

“Footpads of Paris: How French Thugs Ply Their Thieving Trade” (1894)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Monday, 8th February 2016

The following catalogue of ingeniously non-lethal “mugging tricks” perfected by the Parisian “Apache” street gangsters is excerpted and translated from Le Bas du Pavé Parisien by Guy Tomel (1894).

At the turn of the 20th century, the folklore and mystique of les Apaches spread throughout and then far beyond the borders of France, developing into a kind of popular gangster chic.  Members of high society enjoyed exhibitions of the spectacular “danse d’Apache”, which acrobatically mimicked a violent encounter between an Apache pimp and one of his prostitutes; slumming society ladies could even take classes in “la langue verte”, the colourful argot spoken in seedy nightclubs and Montmartre back-alleys.

While one of the Apache mugging tricks – the Coup du Pere Francois – attained a degree of pop-culture infamy that has echoed into the present day, the additional four techniques presented in this article are lesser-known. They provide diverting examples of the type of criminal ingenuity later referred to by Bartitsu founder Edward Barton-Wright, Georges Dubois, Jean Joseph Renaud and their fellow Edwardian-era self defence instructors – several of whom developed scientific counters to the tricks of les Apaches.

FOOTPADS OF PARIS.

How French Thugs Ply Their Thieving Trade
TRICKS OF THE PROFESSION
Various Ways of Attacking a Victim and Escaping.
SOME TYPICAL BLOWS.

In no country in the world is criminality carried to such a pitch as in France, and there is no city where the thief develops his trade with such ingenuity as in Paris – so full of lawlessness and the mysteries of crime.

The Parisian footpad is a criminal in whom generations of villainy have developed a character as shrewd and ingenious as it is pitiless and daring. He makes of crime a fine art, to which he devotes a life-time of study and practice, and the successful theif attains his skill only after passing through all the various grades of the criminal school.

Thieves in Paris have a wholesome dread of the law. The galley labor is not easy and sentences are severe. Besides, once down on the lists of the police, a thief, even if after serving his sentence he be allowed to live in Paris at all, is kept under a perpetual police surveillance which, to the man whose life has been spent in eluding their regard, is well nigh unbearable. And over and above all this is the perpetual dread of the French engine of death – the guillotine.

The catechism of the French criminal, then, begins and ends with the same question – how to attain their ends without brutalizing more than is necessary. All their ingenuity is taxed to invent means of robbery without damaging the victim. For attaining this, they have invented several most curious coups de main, or tricks, by which a man is overpowered and robbed with a swiftness and skill unknown in any other country.

A number of such tricks are used by thieves who work alone, and are most ingenious and named in striking and representative phraseology.

Coup de la Bascule

First in simplicity is what is known as Le Coup de la Bascule – the trick of the rocking chair. Its operation is as follows:

The unsuspicious Parisian, walking home to his hotel late at night, as he turns a corner comes face to face with a man, who, quick as thought, grasps the walker by the throat. Surprised at the suddenness of the attack, the latter has thrown himself instinctively backward.

This gives the thief time to hook his right foot behind his victim’s left, raise it off the ground and push him back upon the one remaining. Feeling himself falling backward, the hands of the man attacked instinctively drop behind him to break his fall instead of grasping his opponent’s throat, and it is just at the instant when the man in tottering and helpless – like a rocking chair – that the thief, still holding his throat by the left hand, with the right goes rapidly through his pockets or abstracts his watch, at the same time throwing him violently backward to the ground.

It needs only a quick “zouave” blow of the feet in the stomach to make it impossible for the man to rise at all, and if he can he is in no condition to pursue the thief, who vanishes at once.

The bancule is a trick performed with swiftness and precision, but it is by no means certain, and hence is not so often employed, except in the most daring and dangerous localities and along the outer boulevards of Paris.

Coup de la Petite Chaise

The commonest trick of all is known as Le Coup de la Petite Chaise – the trick of the little chair.

In this the thief advances from behind, putting his bent right knee in the small of his victim’s back, and bending him half-way back over it. His left hand holds the victim’s throat, and his right reaches over the shoulder and goes through the breast pockets taking both watch and chain. While bent thus backward and thrown off his equilibrium the victim’s blows can reach only the knee of the thief, and the latter’s clutch on the throat makes it impossible for him to turn. It is, of course, the position upon the knee of the thief which gives it its derisive name, “the little chair.”

In this, as in the bascule, the parting blow, delivered as the man is falling, enable the thief to make good his escape. In this instance this is generally in the side of the neck, and often renders the recipient unconscious.

All the boxing skill in the world will avail one nothing In these two tricks, as in both the hands are rendered absolutely useless.

Coup de Pied de Vache

The only means of parrying the latter attack is by employing a trick which the thieves of Paris use principally in resisting arrest by the police. It is called Le Coup de Pied de Vache – the kick of the cow’s foot – and is delivered with such force as sometimes to break the large bones of the leg.

Unhappily, this trick is known much better by the thieves themselves than by men who need it for self-defence. It is most useful, for it can be delivered instantly and without turning when one feels himself grasped from behind.

The one delivering this blow brings his right foot around in front of the left, turning the toe inward, and bringing the leg, well bent at the knee, around behind him, with a strong, semi-circular sweep, which, when well done, even if it breaks no bones, rarely fails to carry a man off his feet. This must, however, be given instantly as soon as touched, as, after the equilibrium has been lost, it is, of course, out of the question.

When the thief is reinforced by an accomplice he employs the more scientific Coup du Pante. This is most sure of success, and has the great advantage over the others that a worn cravat or a badly fastened collar cannot cause it to fail.

Coup du Pante

In the Coup du Pante one thief comes up quickly behind the man to be robbed, seizes both arms and bends them both back. At the same time, as in the bascule, hooking one foot in the other’s ankle and thus breaking his equilibrium. Held in this living net, the victim of the Pante cannot struggle and finds it utterly impossible to utilise either fists or feet.

There is one drawback to this trick, and indeed, to all of those named heretofore. It is that the victim, from beginning to end, can shout as lustily as he may wish and there is always a large chance that his cries may summon help before the thieves can get away from pursuit.

It is this disadvantage which was responsible for the invention of Le Coup du Pere Francois – the very ne plus ultra of criminal ingenuity. It is named after an old and celebrated Parisian criminal who first used it, and taught it to his younger confreres.

This is practically a new trick, but it is continually growing commoner and becoming more and more a part of the primary education of the thief. Its method is as follows:

Coup du Pere Francois 1
Coupe du Pere Francois 2

One thief, holding by the ends a stout silk handkerchief, throws it about the neck of the intended victim, turns his back to him and bends far over, at the same time drawing tight the handkerchief and pulling the man with it backward, nearly off his feet. The victim, feeling the handkerchief strangling him, cannot make the least sound, and his hands try to seize the silk to keep from choking. In the meantime the other thief has been rifling the pockets of the un-happy man.

In less than half a minute suffocation begins, and when the poor devil is released he falls helpless and unconscious on the pavement.

Very often, when set upon his feet, he is absolutely unable to give the slightest account of his aggressors. He has not seen their faces nor known when they approached, nor the direction of their flight. It is like a nightmare, but for the bruised neck.

Le Coup du Pere Francois would be the ideal of the professional thief were it not sometimes accompanied by disagreeable results. When the choking is a little too prolonged, or when the victim has none too good lungs, it occasionally happens that one does not waken from his unconscious state.

An accident of this sort was the cause recently of an official and thorough wiping out of a band of thieves at Neuilly, just outside the walls of Paris.

In a case of this kind, if the thieves be by any chance caught, the judges are not apt to be regardful of the prisoner’s feelings. The punishment is summary, and the grim guillotine is not a thing to whose acquaintance the most desperate footpad would unwittingly lay himself open.

But fatal accidents seldom occur, and until a better one be found Le Coup du Pere Francois will be taught with respect in all thieves’ dens of this most unruly city of the world.

Posted in Hooliganism | Comments Off on “Footpads of Paris: How French Thugs Ply Their Thieving Trade” (1894)

“Bartitsu” Variation in Mortal Kombat

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Friday, 19th February 2016

The Mortal Kombat video game character Bo Rai Cho, a master of zui quan (“drunken kung fu”), has now added a highly stylised and exaggerated form of Bartitsu cane fighting to his arsenal, as demonstrated by the game developers in this new video.

Posted in Pop-culture, Video | Comments Off on “Bartitsu” Variation in Mortal Kombat

The Earliest Known Collaboration Between E.W. Barton-Wright and Pierre Vigny: July 20, 1899

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Tuesday, 1st March 2016

These newly-discovered articles from the St. James’s Gazette offer our first glimpse at the original collaboration between Bartitsu founder Edward Barton-Wright and savate/stick fighting expert Pierre Vigny.  The articles also offer a number of “new” details, including references to Vigny demonstrating a self defence technique while armed with one stick in either hand, and to an exhibition bout of walking stick fighting by Vigny and Barton-Wright. 

Double-Handed guard

Swordsmanship and Walking-stick Play (St James’s Gazette – Wednesday 19 July, 1899)

Mr. Barton-Wright is organising a benefit at the Banqueting Hall, St. James’s Restaurant, tomorrow night, for Professor Pierre Vigny, the celebrated French swordsman and world’s champion of the savate and walking-stick play, both of which form branches of bartitsu.

Mr. Barton-Wright will personally give a lecture and a demonstration of walking-stick play with Professor Vigny, and explain and demonstrate what can done with a stick as means self-defence. He will also assist Professor Vigny in demonstrating the savate, explaining how the different attacks and defences are executed.

Lieut. Ronald Miers, the middle-weight amateur champion of the Army, will give an exhibition of boxing with Mr. Tom Burrows. Fencing will be represented by the best amateur talent. Professor Vigny will also have a bout with duelling swords with the best man who can found to oppose him, and Mons. Cori, the French professional strong man, will give an exhibition of feats of strength.

Bartitsu: The Real Use of the Walking Stick (St James’s Gazette – Saturday 22 July, 1899)

The great beauty of Bartitsu is its completeness. It embraces all methods of self-defence; it is bound down by no rules or restrictions. In boxing, if a man is hit below the belt there is trouble for the offender; fencing is conducted along conventional lines, and even singlestick has its limitations. Bartitsu knows no rule except the law of expediency, and is specially adapted for use on lonely road, in a Whitechapel row, or a single-handed contest with a Walworth Hooligan, when gentle measures would be useless and your opponent is intent on blood.

Mr. Barton Wright, who has adapted this useful accomplishment from many different schools of self-defence, gave an exhibition of its various forms last night at the St. James’s Hall, to introduce to the British public Professor Vigny, who will the principal instructor in walking-stick play and savate when Mr. Wright’s new school is opened.

The programme commenced with bout of fencing between Mr. W. H. P. Staveley and W. P. Gate, which served to indicate to the audience that the sword is the basis not only of all the systems of hand-weapons, but of most theories of defence.

The Use of the Walking Stick

This was followed by a short lecture by Mr. Wright, who initiated his audience into the real value of a walking-stick in a row. In his hands an ordinary cane became a powerful weapon, and the head of the tramp who held up Mr. Wright would be considerably damaged. Professor Vigny, who is the acknowledged expert on the subject, went through a few of the simpler movements slowly just so as to give time to grasp them, and afterwards repeated them at the proper speed.

Everything is done from the wrist, and the swing which it is possible to get on a stick when it is held this way is immense. Either hand can be used, and they should be changed at will; both hands may he employed to execute a sort of body-shove which is very taking; but perhaps the most valuable cut of all is the back stroke. The cane is brought down to the guard and suddenly swung back over the shoulder. Another method which is used to clear the way in an aggressive crowd consists of sweeps with the right and left hand alternately, with, if necessary, the leg cut, delivered just below the knee, after the cane has completed a half-circle in the air. This will usually disable your adversary.

All these movements Professor Vigny executed, and although it improbable that any pupil would ever attain his wonderful knack of using both hands with the greatest ease, or get the whole weight of the body behind the blow, which makes it much more telling, a very few weeks’ practice should enable man to learn enough to hold his own against any one, or even two men who might hold him up.

At the conclusion of this part of the programme, Professor Vigny manipulated two sticks at once, and illustrated his cuts upon the body of Mr. Wright. The most telling, perhaps, was a curious twist of the wrist, by which you get one stick on each side of your adversary’s neck, and lock them behind. A short bout of two rounds between Professor Vigny and Mr. Wright completed this portion of the programme.

La Savate

After Lieut. Ronald Miers and Mr. Tom Burrows had concluded a short boxing match, Prof. Vigny and Prof. Anastasie engaged in La Savate, which is generally, albeit erroneously, believed to be the French method of boxing.  Its peculiar feature is the use of the leg, and it takes some time before the power of balance is mastered sufficiently to enable a man to kick his adversary under the ear, plant your left hand on the point of his jaw and catch him a swinging thump on the ribs at about the same moment.

On this occasion, however, both of the performers were experts, and the audience were immensely interested to see the clever kicks, and the guards which warded them off.  Against this type of boxing an English fighter might have little chance of success, unless he broke his opponent’s leg as a preliminary.

To Make Men Fall

An exhibition by Monsieur Cori, the French professional strong man, had been announced as the concluding item of the programme, but he was too unwell to attend, and Mr. Barton-Wright concluded by illustrating a few of the methods of Bartitsu which you use when you are set upon and have no weapon at hand.

A bold member of the audience mounted the stage.  Mr. Wright took him by the coat and he sat down – heavily.

Mr. Wright pulled his feet from under him; the victim fell on his face.

Once more he got up, but a vice-like grip of the upper part of the arm fetched him on his knees.

“I could break your arm, couldn’t I?” Mr. Wright asked pleasantly.

“You could,” was the reply, so he took him by the hand and flattened him out once more.

After he was satisfied that his strength was useless, (he stood 6 ft., at least), he returned to the audience, and Mr. Wright concluded the entertainment. A most interesting exhibition exercises calculated to be extremely useful to everybody.

Posted in Antagonistics, Boxing, Canonical Bartitsu, E. W. Barton-Wright, Exhibitions, Fencing, Jiujitsu, Savate, Vigny stick fighting | Comments Off on The Earliest Known Collaboration Between E.W. Barton-Wright and Pierre Vigny: July 20, 1899

Further Guard Positions in Vigny Stick Fighting

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Wednesday, 2nd March 2016

These illustrations of various guard positions in the Vigny walking stick system were reproduced in several US newspapers during August of 1904.  This sequence from the Detroit Free Press (August 28, 1904) is the best-quality rendition of the illustrations yet discovered; it is believed that they were copied from a series of actual photographs of Vigny that may have appeared in an article from the Daily Mail newspaper.

Vigny guards

The captions read:

1) Ready to give a good sweeping blow. The stick is lifted well to the back of the head, and the chest thrown back.
2) In this posture a blow is delivered from the shoulder, or as an alternative the small end of the weapon may be used as a dagger.
3) When both hands are used to impart additional strength to the blow, and the user is proficient in ambidexterity, the stick can be twisted, and a blow delivered in almost any direction.
4) When surrounded by two or three antagonists, this is one of the most advantageous methods to adopt, it being possible to deliver blows from back to front and from front to back with tremendous rapidity and force.

The guard positions emphasise the flexibility and diversity of the Vigny method of stick fighting, representing further variations on the three “standard” tactical guards that predominate in Barton-Wright’s Pearson’s Magazine article series and in The Walking Stick Method of Self Defence (1923).

The first illustration was clearly modelled upon the central of these three photographs, which were used to illustrate a 1901 article on the Bartitsu Club published in The Sketch magazine.

Sketch 1901

This photo may well represent one of the original series; unfortunately, the photos that were used to model the other three illustrations have not yet been discovered.

Posted in Instruction, Vigny stick fighting | Comments Off on Further Guard Positions in Vigny Stick Fighting

“Bad News for Honest Burglars” (Dundee Evening Telegraph, January 2 1922)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Thursday, 3rd March 2016

Very occasional references have been made, considerably after the fact, to the idea that Bartitsu founder E.W. Barton-Wright may have continued to teach self-defence into the 1920s. According to the best and most detailed research available to the Bartitsu Society, however, there is no concrete evidence as to Barton-Wright’s involvement in that area post-1902, apart from one anomalous newspaper account of his having appeared as a guest timekeeper for a major wrestling match in London during 1908.

Bearing that in mind, this curious 1922 article may be of interest to Bartitsu enthusiasts as it appears to record the work of an anonymous London self defence teacher whose system bears some resemblance to Bartitsu. It’s entirely possible that the “anonymous teacher” was merely a journalistic device – archive searches have failed to locate any further information on this instructor.

Of the members of Barton-Wright’s circle of colleagues during the Bartitsu Club era, only Yukio Tani, William Garrud and Percy Longhurst are known to have still been involved in the London self defence milieu during the early 1920s; of those three men, Longhurst is possibly the most likely candidate given the nature and terminology of the self defence material described here, though he was better known as a writer on the subject than as an instructor.

It’s also possible that, assuming that the “anonymous teacher” was a real person, his system may have been more-or-less inspired by Barton-Wright’s without any direct connection. Still, the obvious similarities of detail, turns of phrase and sentiment between the writings of the “anonymous instructor” and of E.W. Barton-Wright are, at least, diverting.

Of particular note are the references to “300 tricks” of self defence, exactly matching the number Barton-Wright had named in his 1899 Pearson’s Magazine article, “The New Art of Self Defence” (which alluded to “300 different throws, attacks, counters and tricks based on leverage and balance”); and the active combination of jiujitsu with savate (consistently misspelled by the journalist as “savat”), also as per the Bartitsu curriculum (though occasionally encountered in other 1920s self defence material – in the wake of the various military close-combat systems devised for soldiers during the First World War, the convention of combining the best of various disparate systems had become fairly well established).

The idiosyncratic definition of judo as a method by which “nerves in the exposed parts of the body are struck with the outside edge of the hand or the point of the thumb” may be the result of the informant and/or journalist confusing judo with atemi-waza, which actually is the art of striking nerve plexii. To further confuse matters, Kodokan judo founder Jigoro Kano did research and present atemi techniques, but judo itself could not reasonably be described as a striking art.

Noting also that the journalist’s reference to “Ku Atsuf” is clearly a garbled rendition of kuatsu, the Japanese art of resuscitating an unconscious person. Kuatsu was never identified by name in any c1900 Bartitsu source, but Bartitsu Club instructor Sadakazu Uyenishi was described as having used an identifiable kuatsu technique to resuscitate a wrestling opponent that Uyenishi had rendered unconscious with a stranglehold.


No More Inoffensive House-Holders.

300 “K.0.” Tricks.

Ah, those ominous noises at 3 in the night, as of stealthy movements in the house downstairs! Mr. Caudle’s blood curdles at his wife’s suggestion that should get up and tackle the intruder. One little bullet from revolver or one sickening blow from a jemmy would terminate the adventure for him – thinks poor Caudle.

A London teacher of the arts of self-defence, boxing, and fencing says he marvels at this paralysis and terror. Attack, he says, the very thing one should desire from the burglar, the footpad, or the racecourse ruffian — it gives you such chances! All you want is a few tricks – three are enough – and be the attack what it may, with knife, revolver, or life-preserver, you can be master of the situation in a few seconds.

Scientific Kicks

Half the battle is confidence; the toughest rough breathing is often awed by a show of real mastery. The teacher’s choice is a careful mixture of the arts of jiu-jitsu; savat, the French art of scientific kicks; and judo, a higher degree of Japanese self-defence, in which nerves in the exposed parts of the body are struck with the outside edge of the hand or the point of the thumb.

Knowing judo you can release yourselt from any hold, but you must learn at the same time the science of Ku Atsuf if you would practise the cruel art to its full extent, for having severely judoed your man he might die if you didn’t know how to bring him round.

“I teach about 300 tricks”, said the teacher, “and they are a combination of all the dirtiest tricks known to self-defence the world over. To use an expressive term, they are ‘rotten’, but one does not consider any Marquis of Queensberry rules when one is attacked.

A Useful Trio.

“But three good tricks learned thoroughly well are sufficient to give one the whip hand over any ordinary man — and that in the confined space, say, of a passage. I would recommend the hip throw, the back heel, and the chasse. The first two are jiu-jitsu throws which might well lay a man out temporarily; third is a savat kick on the shin or the knee with all the weight of the body behind it. A man thus kicked will not get up a hurry; it hurts.”

Contrary to general belief, the savat kick is done with the side of the foot — never with the toe. And it is delivered in a way that ensures the kicker retention of his balance.

The teacher has one pupil who is 65 years old. “I have sufficient confidence in him to back him to hold his own against any ordinary man,” he says, “no matter how he likes to attack him. Age is no drawback to one constitutionally sound and fairly active.”

“I do not necessarily teach the same set of tricks to each person, but select them according to his constitution and build. If a man is good on his legs there is nothing like savat. Otherwise I would give him a little jiu-jitsu or judo.”

Posted in Antagonistics, E. W. Barton-Wright, Jiujitsu, Savate | Comments Off on “Bad News for Honest Burglars” (Dundee Evening Telegraph, January 2 1922)