“Jiu Jitsu For Mental Nurses” (1911)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Monday, 6th November 2017

A historical curiosity from the Aberdeen Press and Journal of 4 January, 1911, detailing the self-defence training of psychiatric nurses via the game of “Indian wrestling” and some basic jiujitsu techniques. 

Interestingly, Bartitsu Club fencing instructor Captain Alfred Hutton is believed to have been the first person in the Western world to teach Japanese martial arts as self-defence in a therapeutic environment, passing on some of the “tricks” he had learned from his young colleagues Yukio Tani and Sadakazu Uyenishi to London doctors.

Also of note is this article, which describes an informal system of “American jiujitsu” devised by psychiatric hospital workers that is said to have pre-dated the introduction of Japanese jiujitsu to the United States.

While the use of “therapeutic holds” and self-defence is still an important aspect of training for workers in psychiatric care, the modern approach completely eschews the type of painful and potentially dangerous holds described in this article, in favour of a system of non-violent, leverage-based team takedown and control techniques.  The modern system is also deeply aware of the danger of positional asphyxia, strictly avoiding any holds that may inadvertently restrict a patient’s ability to breathe.

An American correspondent for the Nursing Mirror says-—I recently had the opportunity of witnessing the usefulness of jiu-jitsu as an aid to the nurses in a private sanatorium. It is included as part of course in hydrotherapy, and falls naturally into place with the study of physical movements and massage.

The nurses, for this purpose, are dressed in strong bathing costumes. They are first taught the holds and throws of Indian wrestling. This gives suppleness, and the application of their strength is new to the girls, many of whom have never since childhood put forth any severe muscular effort demanding agility. Indian wrestling is performed by two opponents holding each other by the corresponding hand and placing the corresponding foot close up to that of the adversary. The loser is the one who first moves either foot from its place or touches the ground with any other part of the body, the hand not excepted. Every muscle in the body is exercised in this way, and great improvement in the ability handle one’s self is quickly attained.

After this preparation, the holds of jiu-jitsu proper taught, and it is with these that the nurses protect from or control the patient. The chief of holds is the “straight arm”, which consists of a hyper-extension of the elbow over the fulcrum provided by either the nurse’s shoulder or forearm, the power being represented by the nurse’s other hand pulling the patient’s wrist. It is impossible withdraw from this position of mechanical disadvantage and any attempt to do so causes intense pain in the elbow, and if this is ignored, the leverage is sufficient to fracture the arm.

Another useful hold is the hammer-lock, consisting of the elevation of the arm behind the back under the shoulder, combined with an internal rotation at the wrist. The mechanical disadvantage and pain of this grip gives easy and perfect control over an obstinate or dangerous patient, and with this hold a frail woman can easily control a strong man.

Another hold is the hyperflexion of the phalanges of the fifth finger. This depends upon its painfulness, but it is a very convenient way of leading patients without attracting attention.

These are the main elements, but the nurse may sometimes find herself in difficulties when unexpectedly attacked, and jiu-jitsu teaches an appropriate way to meet every dangerous position when she is attacked. If she attacked by a patient swinging a dub, stick, or chair, there is an infallible defence, which can injure neither herself nor the patient. It is merely the football tackle – diving under the descending weapon and knocking the patient down by his legs. I venture to say that no woman, and very few men, would spontaneously attempt this until trained.

In a general melee against an active man it may not possible to obtain any of these holds, but the head and neck always offer themselves to the well-known chancery hold. Of course, very few women would even think of such a procedure unless trained, but its usefulness in a desperate situation is beyond question.

The paramount value in acquiring this skill is that the nurse can be sent for long walks with almost any kind of patients without any feeling of danger on the part of those who are responsible for her safety. The importance of this freedom to the patient is quite evident in these days of treatment by work in the open air, and has the additional merit of showing patients that their attendants have no fear of them.

Posted in Jiujitsu | Comments Off on “Jiu Jitsu For Mental Nurses” (1911)

Baritsu in Denny O’Neil’s “Sherlock Holmes” Comic Book Adaptation (1975)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Monday, 9th October 2017

Famed comics writer/editor Denny O’Neil offers his take on the famous “baritsu” fight between Sherlock Holmes and Professor James Moriarty in these scenes from O’Neil’s Sherlock Holmes #1 (1975).

At the end of the first chapter, Holmes encounters Moriarty at the brink of the Reichenbach Falls in the Swiss Alps.  Both men appear certain to plunge into the roiling abyss …

… and, indeed, that is what Holmes’ boon companion, John Watson, deduces to have happened when he examines the scene.  However, as Holmes later explains:

Posted in Baritsu, Pop-culture, Sherlock Holmes | Comments Off on Baritsu in Denny O’Neil’s “Sherlock Holmes” Comic Book Adaptation (1975)

La Savate vs. Boxing in London (The Sportsman, 26 March, 1904)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Saturday, 7th October 2017

Given the traditional rivalries between France and England, it’s unsurprising that savate vs. boxing contests around the turn of the 20th century should have attracted considerable interest and generated considerable controversy. The infamous Charlemont vs. Driscoll match of October 19th, 1899 caused outrage among the English sporting press and public and very likely influenced E.W. Barton-Wright’s presentation of the Bartitsu curriculum.

The Charlemont/Driscoll contest had a belated and little-known sequel in late March of 1904, when Thomas “Pedlar” Palmer challenged Louis Anastasie to a public bout on stage at London’s Britannia Theatre:

Posted in Boxing, Savate | Comments Off on La Savate vs. Boxing in London (The Sportsman, 26 March, 1904)

The Athletic Jagendorfer (1905)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Monday, 2nd October 2017

According to a report in the Birmingham Daily Gazette of 12 October, 1905, the celebrated wrestler, strongman and club-swinging champion Georg Jagendorfer would shortly begin instructing the Viennese police in the gentle art of jiujitsu.  Jagendorfer, the article noted, had been studying the system with several Japanese experts and had also “discovered several original tricks by which it has been widened in scope”.

Jagendorfer poses with a truly impressive array of Indian clubs and sledgehammers.

Given that Jagendorfer weighed in at a respectable 277 pounds, it’s slightly surprising that he felt any urgent need to pursue jiujitsu training.  It’s also tempting to speculate about what might have happened if Jagendorfer had challenged fellow strongman (and Yukio Tani’s erstwhile manager) William “Apollo” Bankier to a jiujitsu contest.  A match between those two heavyweights, each one attempting to win by yielding to the other’s strength, would have made a diverting spectacle.

Posted in Edwardiana, Jiujitsu, Physical Culture | Comments Off on The Athletic Jagendorfer (1905)

“The Claims of Ju-Jitsu” (The Sportsman, 4th May 1906)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Saturday, 2nd September 2017
Above: a technical illustration from Percy Longhurst’s article “Has the Boxer Any Chance Agaainst the Ju-jitsuite?” (1906)

The following letter to the editor of The Sportsman was written during the ongoing “jujitsu vs. boxing” controversy of 1906-7.

The “boxing vs. jujitsu” debate was typically argued from a theoretical point of view, the consensus being that, as the Sportsman correspondent notes, a true contest between those styles would not be allowed in London at that time.  Although Pierre Vigny himself also publicly challenged a jujitsuka, nothing came of it; however, about a year before the above letter was published, another French savateur had tried conclusions against Japanese unarmed combat.

It’s worth noting that experimental contests of this nature probably had been carried out “behind closed doors” in London, as evidenced by the pragmatic assessments offered by E.W. Barton-Wright and Percy Longhurst, both of whom allowed that each method had its advantages and advocated for a fusion approach.

In his February, 1901 lecture for the Japan Society of London, Barton-Wright said:

In order to ensure as far as it was possible immunity against injury in cowardly attacks or quarrels, (one) must understand boxing in order to thoroughly appreciate the danger and rapidity of a well-directed blow, and the particular parts of the body which are scientifically attacked. The same, of course, applies to the use of the foot or the stick …

Judo and jiujitsu are not designed as primary means of attack and defence against a boxer or a man who kicks you, but (are) only supposed to be used after coming to close quarters, and in order to get to close quarters, it is absolutely necessary to understand boxing and the use of the foot.

Some years later, Longhurst amplified Barton-Wright’s realistic take on the boxing vs. jujitsu scenario via an article for Sandow’s Magazine, titled “Has the boxer any chance against the jujitsuite?”, which was re-published in the second volume of the Bartitsu Compendium (2008).

Posted in Antagonistics, Boxing, Jiujitsu | Comments Off on “The Claims of Ju-Jitsu” (The Sportsman, 4th May 1906)

John Steed’s Umbrella-Fu

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Saturday, 2nd September 2017

Secret agent John Steed (Ralph Fiennes) wields a mean brolly in this training sequence from The Avengers (1998). Choreographed by the great English fight director William Hobbs, Steed’s impeccable umbrella-fu was probably the most entertaining part of the movie, which bombed at the box office.

See here for further information on Steed’s weaponised umbrella as featured in the classic Avengers TV series, starring Patrick Macnee.

Posted in Antagonistics, Fiction, Video | Comments Off on John Steed’s Umbrella-Fu

“Victory of the Foreigner”: Pierre Vigny vs. Professor Perkins (May, 1899)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Saturday, 2nd September 2017

This newly-discovered article from the Sporting Life of 24 May, 1899 records one of Pierre Vigny’s first public forays into the London antagonistics scene.  

Above: Pierre Vigny adopts the regulation Marquis of Queensberry stance.
Professor Perkins (England) vs. Professor Vigny (Switzerland)

Six Rounds Hardly Fought With 6-oz Gloves

At a snug and luxurious retreat in a swell part of London, about thirty sportsmen met to see the above two men do battle after the Marquis of Queensberry’s rules. With Bat Mullins as timekeeper, and M. Skeate as judge, the affair was entire success.  A difference of age told its own tale, although the loser took his gruel like a man.

Professor Vigny hails from France, where he first saw the light in 1865, but he has settled down in Switzerland. He is a strong, strapping fighter, who makes deadly use of his left. He has boxed with most of the European professors, and means touring through England so as to gain experience. He can use foils, fleurets, swords, singlesticks, and is expert in French and English boxing.

Professor Perkins is teacher of boxing to the Brigade of Foot Guards and 2nd Life Guards. He hails from Cornwall (same parish as Fitzsimmons), is forty-two years of age, scales 12st 8oz. (2 lb. more than his opponent), and has done battle with Tom Lees (Australia). Peter McCoy (New York), Jim Kane (Californian Giant), and many others.

THE CONTEST.—VIGNY WINS.

Both looked hard as nails as they stripped, very little time being lost ere they shaped up for

Round 1.—The visitor landed several times on face and chest, Perkins going for the body.

Round 2.—Animated sparring on both sides, and hard hitting characterised this bout, both playing for opening. Slightly in favour the Swiss was this round.

Round 3.—Savage slogging, the visitor being cautioned for hitting low. A give and take set-to made honours easy.

Round 4.—Both looked anxious and sparred for a breather, the time expiring with little done.

Round 6.—Fast fighting and hard hitting by the Swiss, who stood, then crouched as he lashed out, his left getting dangerously near to Perkin’s heart. Little to choose at the close of three minutes.

Round 6 and last.—ln-fighting by Vigny, who tried repeatedly for the knock-out blow. Down went Perkins, he rising and appeared groggy. Warming to his work he did his best, only to lose a game battle which was credit to both the men.

After winning this fight, Vigny remained in London where he gave a series of fencing and self-defence exhibitions including several organised by E.W. Barton-Wright.  Vigny later became the Chief Instructor at Barton-Wright’s Bartitsu Academy of Arms and Physical Culture, where he taught savate and walking stick defence.

Posted in Boxing, Canonical Bartitsu, Savate | Comments Off on “Victory of the Foreigner”: Pierre Vigny vs. Professor Perkins (May, 1899)

Who Was the Bartitsu Club’s Mysterious “Instructor Hubert”?

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Friday, 1st September 2017
The Bartitsu Club instructor known only as “Hubert” demonstrates the Front Guard of Vigny stick fighting.

The roster of instructors at E.W. Barton-Wright’s Bartitsu School of Arms included Pierre Vigny (savate and walking stick defence), Yukio Tani and Sadakazu Uyenishi (jiujitsu), Armand Cherpillod (wrestling and physical culture), Captain Alfred Hutton (fencing) and Kate Behnke (calisthenics and breathing exercises).

An anonymous feature article on the Bartitsu Club appearing in the Black and White Budget magazine of December, 1900, however, introduces a seventh instructor, named only as “Hubert”.  Hubert is also shown in two of the photographs illustrating that article, partnering Vigny in demonstrating boxing/savate and stick fighting techniques.

While the Black and White Budget feature is the only known source that directly refers to Hubert, he may have been obliquely referred to in an article from The Sketch of April, 1901.  The author of Defence Against “Hooligans”: Bartitsu Methods in London writes that:

The Bartitsu Club, through its Professors, over whom Mr. Barton-Wright keeps an admonishing eye, guarantees you against all danger. In one corner is M. Vigny, the World’s Champion with the single-stick: the Champion who is the acknowledged master of savate trains his pupils in another.

Given that most sources list Vigny himself as the Club’s savate instructor, it’s possible that Hubert was still teaching savate there in April, 1901.

Research suggests that this mystery instructor may well have been Hubert Desruelles, a young former student of Parisian savate master Charles Charlemont.  The best evidence lies in comparing these two pictures, the first showing “Hubert” boxing with Vigny in 1900:

… and the second showing Hubert Desruelles in 1910:

Although not conclusive, the physical resemblance is striking.

Along with his brother Jean, Hubert Desruelles was active in French savate and boxing circles during the early 20th century, and the brothers ran their own savate academies in Lille and Robaix from circa 1900 – 1914.  Given his infrequent appearance in Bartitsu-related media, it may be that Hubert joined the Bartitsu Club staff on a temporary and/or casual basis during a visit to London.

Sadly, the athletic career of Hubert Desruelles – who had once held the title of French champion at the English style of boxing – was cut short when he was badly wounded in both arms during the First World War.

Posted in Bartitsu School of Arms, Biography, Canonical Bartitsu, Savate, Vigny stick fighting | Comments Off on Who Was the Bartitsu Club’s Mysterious “Instructor Hubert”?

“Le Jiu-jitsu” (11 November, 1905)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Thursday, 3rd August 2017

A gallery of cartoons from the Parisian magazine Le Rire, imagining the impact of jiu-jitsu upon French society in the wake of jiujitsuka Ernest Regnier’s victory over savateur Georges Dubois.

Posted in Edwardiana, Humour, Jiujitsu | Comments Off on “Le Jiu-jitsu” (11 November, 1905)

“Tani, the Japanese Wrestler” (1905)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Tuesday, 11th July 2017

From the 1905 omnibus edition of Mind and Body: A Monthly Journal Devoted to Physical Education:

JIU-JITSU HAS 300 MOVES THAT AN EXPERT MUST KNOW, AND HE CAN THEN DEFEAT ANY STRONG MAN IGNORANT OF THEM.

TANI, the Japanese wrestler, was in the midst of a bout with an alert, muscular young Englishman from the Mile End Road. The Englishman was doing very well and the audience at the Royal, Holborn, were enthusiastically on his side, urging him with shouts of encouragement, native to East End, to hold on like death.

The odds seemed to be in his favour. He was the bigger man of the two, and apparently the stronger. He had good, stout limbs, yet he was lithe and quick. It seemed absurd to set him against the short, slight, wiry Japanese, who looked even less than his eight stone ten.

And the Japanese was down on his back, and the Englishman held him with a grip of irbn, and the Mile End Road thought he could do it for the five minutes that remained of the stipulated fifteen, and thus win the prize.

Suddenly there was a change. The Japanese wriggled out of trouble like a cat. He stepped around his opponent as lightly as if he were waltzing, seized a wrist, hitched the man down with a leg trip, and at once, sinking on his back at right angles to the Englishman, threw his leg across the man’s neck and held him there like a log until Mile End Road tapped the mat in signal of defeat.

There were some murmurings among the audience. It looked suspiciously as if the Japanese had half strangled his opponent, and the Englishman’s admission from the stage that he had nothing to complain of scarcely removed the impression. I went behind the scenes afterward and Tani showed me this particular fall.

“Well,” said he, “you are in the street and you desire my life. You have a heavy dagger and I have none. You make a downward plunge — so; and see what happens.”

I made the downward plunge in a double sense. Quick as lightning Tani had me by the wrist, his other hand pressed hard on my shoulder, the back of his leg pressing inward on the back of mine.

I went sprawling on my back, Tani slipped down on his and his leg was curled over my throat. But,that was the least part of the operation, only designed to keep my head in position. Tani had retained his hold on my wrist and now held it with both hands. The slightest struggle on my part exerted a pressure on the elbow which went near to breaking the arm. With my disengaged hand I beat a violent tattoo on the mat to indicate that I was convinced.

“That’s all very well with me, being no lion in strength,” I said. “But what would happen with Hackenschmidt? You couldn’t get his arm down for that lock.”

“This,” said the Japanese—and he quickly turned the arm the other way, fixing the lock of exquisite agony. “In fact,” he pursued, “the bigger the man the better I like him. It is his strength, not mine, that does the mischief. That stands to reason. If I put on a lock he cannot break, the harder he may struggle against it the greater the damage he enjoys.”

To correctly appreciate jiu-jitsu, it is necessary to understand that it is more than a sport, designed to teach the student to meet every form of attack that may be made upon him.

It was developed by men who had made a profound study of anatomy and the laws of leverage and force; and it was perfected by generation after generation of clever men. Every boy of the samurai or warrior class was taught it, and it was their favorite form of competitive sport.

There is one deadly grip which always offends English notions of fair play. That is what Apollo, Tani’s manager, christened the knockout blow.

Tani grips both sides of your collar, hands crossed, palms outward, puts one foot on your thigh, and falls backward. You fall with him. Retaining his double grip on the collar and his leg on the thigh, he rolls over and you roll over with him. Then, like a cat, he is sitting astride your chest, and you are done.

This grip is generally regarded by British audiences as a strangle, and it has been known to provoke howls of protest. But it is not a strangle, as I can testify by personal experience. The pressure is all at the sides and back of the neck, the windpipe not being touched.

Appollo tried it and found the sensation that of “floating among clouds in a perfectly happy state.” He wondered how it was done, and Tani could not explain.

Then he read that a Dutch physician, while sojourning among the Japanese, found that the native doctors, when performing slight operations, used no anaesthetics, but simply applied pressure to the carotid artery, by which means the patient was rendered unconscious.

That was the explanation of the Japanese knock-out grip. Pressure on the two carotid arteries arrested the flow of blood to the brain, and the victim, if he was too proud to give the signal, drifted out of conscious existence.

I asked Tani to show me his reply to a kick. He allowed me to kick him, but he caught the foot, twisted the toe around, and on the instant had me sprawling on the mat, tied up in a contorted knot, from which I was uncommonly glad to be released.

One thing which I particularly noticed in these falls was that Tani left me to do the hard work. He cajoled me off my balancc, I fell, as he wanted me to fall, and he then had me in a lock wherein, if I was anxious for a broken bone, the breaking had to come from me. He wrestles as if he were playing chess, and while you are still standing, he makes the hold which he exercises when you are thrown.

Apollo admits that after two years’ constant practice with Tani he began to “rather fancy himself” at the art. So one day he made a wager with Tani that he could withstand him for 15 minutes. And in exactly three minutes Apollo was beaten by a hold that he had never seen before. It is asserted that there are some 300 moves in the game, with which a wrestler must be familiar before he is regarded as a master.

But, as Tani says, why use more variations than you need? “There were two of us, and we used to show the art of defense against a street attack. My comrade, he attack me, and I throw him out. But what use is that? We do it so quickly that the people think it is a made-up job, some juggling, or something, and they only laugh. It is the same when two Japanese wrestle on the stage. If you do not know the fine points of the game, how can you see they are good?

“And so it is better for me to wrestle with your Englishmen, so that you can see how we combat their attacks. And how I should love to try it on one of your biggest champions! But they want me to play their game, which I do not know: and if it is a game merely of strength, how shall a man of nine stone beat a man of fourteen?”

Posted in Jiujitsu | Comments Off on “Tani, the Japanese Wrestler” (1905)