Extreme Stick Fighting

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Monday, 6th November 2017

Worth bearing in mind when one’s martial practice starts to become too academic; there is gently going through the motions, and then there is Extreme Stick Fighting (click here for video). These two combatants demonstrate impressive toughness and courage in fighting full-contact and unarmoured, with very few apparent rules, on uneven, natural terrain.

While it can be argued that, for example, a classic Vigny cane would be expected to do more damage than a shorter, evenly-weighted rattan stick, it’s also important to note that adrenaline can allow a fighter to ignore many strikes that might be assumed to be fight-stoppers under less extreme circumstances.  It follows that grappling, including ground-fighting, is a crucial skill.  Endurance, luck, improvisation under pressure and will-power are all important factors in surviving, let alone winning, a combat of this nature.

Posted in Sparring, Video | Comments Off on Extreme Stick Fighting

The Bartitsu Club as Imagined in “Suffrajitsu: Mrs. Pankhurst’s Amazons” (2015)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Monday, 6th November 2017

In the 2015 graphic novel Suffrajitsu: Mrs. Pankhurst’s Amazons, the Bartitsu School of Arms serves as the gymnasium and headquarters of a secret society of female bodyguards who protect the radical suffragettes from arrest and assault. The graphic novels were commissioned as part of the Foreworld Saga, a multimedia franchise initiated by speculative fiction authors Neal Stephenson and Mark Teppo.

While there was a real-life Bodyguard team who defended Emmeline Pankhurst and other notable suffragettes circa 1913/14, they were not, historically, based at the Bartitsu Club, which had closed its doors for the last time in 1902.

That said, as shown in the graphic novels, this fictional Bartitsu Club did draw a great deal of inspiration from history …

Amazons training in the Bartitsu Club

The physical layout of the Suffrajitsu universe’s Bartitsu School of Arms is closely based on that of the Forteza Western Martial Arts school in Ravenswood, Chicago (home of the Bartitsu Club of Chicago).  Comparatively little is known about the layout of the real Bartitsu Club in Shaftesbury Avenue, except that it was a large basement space featuring white tiled walls and support pillars.

The stalwart chap bracing the punching bag in the foreground is Armand Cherpillod, who was (in real history) the Bartitsu Club’s wrestling and physical culture instructor.

The two jiujitsu throws shown in the foreground and medium ground are closely based on techniques shown in Emily Watts‘ Fine Art of Jiu-jutsu (1906).  Mrs. Watts was, in fact, a student of Sadakazu Uyenishi, who is shown observing the suffragette Bodyguards’ training in the medium background.

The Amazons shown in the background are practicing the Vigny style of stick fighting and savate, as taught at the real Bartitsu Club by Pierre Vigny.  The Amazon defending herself against her training partner’s savate kick is demonstrating a variation of “How to Defend Yourself with a Stick against the most Dangerous Kick of an Expert Kicker“, as per Barton-Wright’s 1901 article Self-Defence With A Walking Stick.

The elaborate sigil above Uyenishi’s head is the symbol of the Ordo Militum Vindicis Intactae, a secret order of martial artists who play a major role in the earlier Foreworld stories.

The longsword and other swords barely visible on the wall behind Uyenishi are nods to Captain Alfred Hutton, who taught Elizabethan-era fencing styles at the real Bartitsu Club.

The Amazons emerging from a trapdoor hidden under the mats of the Bartitsu Club is a reference to an anecdote told by Edith Garrud, who taught self-defence to the real suffragette Bodyguard team (and who makes a cameo appearance in the third panel above).

According to Edith, her London dojo was used as a safe-house by suffragettes escaping from the police after window-smashing protests.  It featured a trapdoor in which they would hide their street clothes and any remaining missile weapons, so they would appear to be innocently practicing jiujitsu when the police came knocking at the dojo door.

The technique posters shown in the background of this picture are actually miniaturised images of real Bartitsu techniques from E.W. Barton-Wright’s “Self-Defence with a Walking Stick” article.

The sparring equipment worn by Barton-Wright and his niece and student Persephone is based on protective clothing actually worn by combat athletes during the Victorian and Edwardian periods, including cricket pads for the knees and shins, padded fencing gloves, sabre fencing masks and padded vests.

Barton-Wright (left) is assuming the classic “rear guard” of Vigny stick fighting, while Persephone counters with the “double-handed guard”.

This picture of the Bartitsu Club’s elaborate electrotherapy clinic, which is adjacent to the combat gymnasium, is closely based on photographs of Barton-Wright’s real clinic.  After the Bartitsu Club closed, Barton-Wright persisted in the therapeutic field for the remainder of his career, specialising in various forms of heat, light, electrical and vibrational therapies to alleviate the pain of arthritis and rheumatism.

Posted in Bartitsu School of Arms, Fiction, Pop-culture | Comments Off on The Bartitsu Club as Imagined in “Suffrajitsu: Mrs. Pankhurst’s Amazons” (2015)

“Jiu Jitsu For Mental Nurses” (1911)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Monday, 6th November 2017

A historical curiosity from the Aberdeen Press and Journal of 4 January, 1911, detailing the self-defence training of psychiatric nurses via the game of “Indian wrestling” and some basic jiujitsu techniques. 

Interestingly, Bartitsu Club fencing instructor Captain Alfred Hutton is believed to have been the first person in the Western world to teach Japanese martial arts as self-defence in a therapeutic environment, passing on some of the “tricks” he had learned from his young colleagues Yukio Tani and Sadakazu Uyenishi to London doctors.

Also of note is this article, which describes an informal system of “American jiujitsu” devised by psychiatric hospital workers that is said to have pre-dated the introduction of Japanese jiujitsu to the United States.

While the use of “therapeutic holds” and self-defence is still an important aspect of training for workers in psychiatric care, the modern approach completely eschews the type of painful and potentially dangerous holds described in this article, in favour of a system of non-violent, leverage-based team takedown and control techniques.  The modern system is also deeply aware of the danger of positional asphyxia, strictly avoiding any holds that may inadvertently restrict a patient’s ability to breathe.

An American correspondent for the Nursing Mirror says-—I recently had the opportunity of witnessing the usefulness of jiu-jitsu as an aid to the nurses in a private sanatorium. It is included as part of course in hydrotherapy, and falls naturally into place with the study of physical movements and massage.

The nurses, for this purpose, are dressed in strong bathing costumes. They are first taught the holds and throws of Indian wrestling. This gives suppleness, and the application of their strength is new to the girls, many of whom have never since childhood put forth any severe muscular effort demanding agility. Indian wrestling is performed by two opponents holding each other by the corresponding hand and placing the corresponding foot close up to that of the adversary. The loser is the one who first moves either foot from its place or touches the ground with any other part of the body, the hand not excepted. Every muscle in the body is exercised in this way, and great improvement in the ability handle one’s self is quickly attained.

After this preparation, the holds of jiu-jitsu proper taught, and it is with these that the nurses protect from or control the patient. The chief of holds is the “straight arm”, which consists of a hyper-extension of the elbow over the fulcrum provided by either the nurse’s shoulder or forearm, the power being represented by the nurse’s other hand pulling the patient’s wrist. It is impossible withdraw from this position of mechanical disadvantage and any attempt to do so causes intense pain in the elbow, and if this is ignored, the leverage is sufficient to fracture the arm.

Another useful hold is the hammer-lock, consisting of the elevation of the arm behind the back under the shoulder, combined with an internal rotation at the wrist. The mechanical disadvantage and pain of this grip gives easy and perfect control over an obstinate or dangerous patient, and with this hold a frail woman can easily control a strong man.

Another hold is the hyperflexion of the phalanges of the fifth finger. This depends upon its painfulness, but it is a very convenient way of leading patients without attracting attention.

These are the main elements, but the nurse may sometimes find herself in difficulties when unexpectedly attacked, and jiu-jitsu teaches an appropriate way to meet every dangerous position when she is attacked. If she attacked by a patient swinging a dub, stick, or chair, there is an infallible defence, which can injure neither herself nor the patient. It is merely the football tackle – diving under the descending weapon and knocking the patient down by his legs. I venture to say that no woman, and very few men, would spontaneously attempt this until trained.

In a general melee against an active man it may not possible to obtain any of these holds, but the head and neck always offer themselves to the well-known chancery hold. Of course, very few women would even think of such a procedure unless trained, but its usefulness in a desperate situation is beyond question.

The paramount value in acquiring this skill is that the nurse can be sent for long walks with almost any kind of patients without any feeling of danger on the part of those who are responsible for her safety. The importance of this freedom to the patient is quite evident in these days of treatment by work in the open air, and has the additional merit of showing patients that their attendants have no fear of them.

Posted in Jiujitsu | Comments Off on “Jiu Jitsu For Mental Nurses” (1911)

Baritsu in Denny O’Neil’s “Sherlock Holmes” Comic Book Adaptation (1975)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Monday, 9th October 2017

Famed comics writer/editor Denny O’Neil offers his take on the famous “baritsu” fight between Sherlock Holmes and Professor James Moriarty in these scenes from O’Neil’s Sherlock Holmes #1 (1975).

At the end of the first chapter, Holmes encounters Moriarty at the brink of the Reichenbach Falls in the Swiss Alps.  Both men appear certain to plunge into the roiling abyss …

… and, indeed, that is what Holmes’ boon companion, John Watson, deduces to have happened when he examines the scene.  However, as Holmes later explains:

Posted in Baritsu, Pop-culture, Sherlock Holmes | Comments Off on Baritsu in Denny O’Neil’s “Sherlock Holmes” Comic Book Adaptation (1975)

La Savate vs. Boxing in London (The Sportsman, 26 March, 1904)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Saturday, 7th October 2017

Given the traditional rivalries between France and England, it’s unsurprising that savate vs. boxing contests around the turn of the 20th century should have attracted considerable interest and generated considerable controversy. The infamous Charlemont vs. Driscoll match of October 19th, 1899 caused outrage among the English sporting press and public and very likely influenced E.W. Barton-Wright’s presentation of the Bartitsu curriculum.

The Charlemont/Driscoll contest had a belated and little-known sequel in late March of 1904, when Thomas “Pedlar” Palmer challenged Louis Anastasie to a public bout on stage at London’s Britannia Theatre:

Posted in Boxing, Savate | Comments Off on La Savate vs. Boxing in London (The Sportsman, 26 March, 1904)

The Athletic Jagendorfer (1905)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Monday, 2nd October 2017

According to a report in the Birmingham Daily Gazette of 12 October, 1905, the celebrated wrestler, strongman and club-swinging champion Georg Jagendorfer would shortly begin instructing the Viennese police in the gentle art of jiujitsu.  Jagendorfer, the article noted, had been studying the system with several Japanese experts and had also “discovered several original tricks by which it has been widened in scope”.

Jagendorfer poses with a truly impressive array of Indian clubs and sledgehammers.

Given that Jagendorfer weighed in at a respectable 277 pounds, it’s slightly surprising that he felt any urgent need to pursue jiujitsu training.  It’s also tempting to speculate about what might have happened if Jagendorfer had challenged fellow strongman (and Yukio Tani’s erstwhile manager) William “Apollo” Bankier to a jiujitsu contest.  A match between those two heavyweights, each one attempting to win by yielding to the other’s strength, would have made a diverting spectacle.

Posted in Edwardiana, Jiujitsu, Physical Culture | Comments Off on The Athletic Jagendorfer (1905)

“The Claims of Ju-Jitsu” (The Sportsman, 4th May 1906)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Saturday, 2nd September 2017
Above: a technical illustration from Percy Longhurst’s article “Has the Boxer Any Chance Agaainst the Ju-jitsuite?” (1906)

The following letter to the editor of The Sportsman was written during the ongoing “jujitsu vs. boxing” controversy of 1906-7.

The “boxing vs. jujitsu” debate was typically argued from a theoretical point of view, the consensus being that, as the Sportsman correspondent notes, a true contest between those styles would not be allowed in London at that time.  Although Pierre Vigny himself also publicly challenged a jujitsuka, nothing came of it; however, about a year before the above letter was published, another French savateur had tried conclusions against Japanese unarmed combat.

It’s worth noting that experimental contests of this nature probably had been carried out “behind closed doors” in London, as evidenced by the pragmatic assessments offered by E.W. Barton-Wright and Percy Longhurst, both of whom allowed that each method had its advantages and advocated for a fusion approach.

In his February, 1901 lecture for the Japan Society of London, Barton-Wright said:

In order to ensure as far as it was possible immunity against injury in cowardly attacks or quarrels, (one) must understand boxing in order to thoroughly appreciate the danger and rapidity of a well-directed blow, and the particular parts of the body which are scientifically attacked. The same, of course, applies to the use of the foot or the stick …

Judo and jiujitsu are not designed as primary means of attack and defence against a boxer or a man who kicks you, but (are) only supposed to be used after coming to close quarters, and in order to get to close quarters, it is absolutely necessary to understand boxing and the use of the foot.

Some years later, Longhurst amplified Barton-Wright’s realistic take on the boxing vs. jujitsu scenario via an article for Sandow’s Magazine, titled “Has the boxer any chance against the jujitsuite?”, which was re-published in the second volume of the Bartitsu Compendium (2008).

Posted in Antagonistics, Boxing, Jiujitsu | Comments Off on “The Claims of Ju-Jitsu” (The Sportsman, 4th May 1906)

John Steed’s Umbrella-Fu

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Saturday, 2nd September 2017

Secret agent John Steed (Ralph Fiennes) wields a mean brolly in this training sequence from The Avengers (1998). Choreographed by the great English fight director William Hobbs, Steed’s impeccable umbrella-fu was probably the most entertaining part of the movie, which bombed at the box office.

See here for further information on Steed’s weaponised umbrella as featured in the classic Avengers TV series, starring Patrick Macnee.

Posted in Antagonistics, Fiction, Video | Comments Off on John Steed’s Umbrella-Fu

“Victory of the Foreigner”: Pierre Vigny vs. Professor Perkins (May, 1899)

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Saturday, 2nd September 2017

This newly-discovered article from the Sporting Life of 24 May, 1899 records one of Pierre Vigny’s first public forays into the London antagonistics scene.  

Above: Pierre Vigny adopts the regulation Marquis of Queensberry stance.
Professor Perkins (England) vs. Professor Vigny (Switzerland)

Six Rounds Hardly Fought With 6-oz Gloves

At a snug and luxurious retreat in a swell part of London, about thirty sportsmen met to see the above two men do battle after the Marquis of Queensberry’s rules. With Bat Mullins as timekeeper, and M. Skeate as judge, the affair was entire success.  A difference of age told its own tale, although the loser took his gruel like a man.

Professor Vigny hails from France, where he first saw the light in 1865, but he has settled down in Switzerland. He is a strong, strapping fighter, who makes deadly use of his left. He has boxed with most of the European professors, and means touring through England so as to gain experience. He can use foils, fleurets, swords, singlesticks, and is expert in French and English boxing.

Professor Perkins is teacher of boxing to the Brigade of Foot Guards and 2nd Life Guards. He hails from Cornwall (same parish as Fitzsimmons), is forty-two years of age, scales 12st 8oz. (2 lb. more than his opponent), and has done battle with Tom Lees (Australia). Peter McCoy (New York), Jim Kane (Californian Giant), and many others.

THE CONTEST.—VIGNY WINS.

Both looked hard as nails as they stripped, very little time being lost ere they shaped up for

Round 1.—The visitor landed several times on face and chest, Perkins going for the body.

Round 2.—Animated sparring on both sides, and hard hitting characterised this bout, both playing for opening. Slightly in favour the Swiss was this round.

Round 3.—Savage slogging, the visitor being cautioned for hitting low. A give and take set-to made honours easy.

Round 4.—Both looked anxious and sparred for a breather, the time expiring with little done.

Round 6.—Fast fighting and hard hitting by the Swiss, who stood, then crouched as he lashed out, his left getting dangerously near to Perkin’s heart. Little to choose at the close of three minutes.

Round 6 and last.—ln-fighting by Vigny, who tried repeatedly for the knock-out blow. Down went Perkins, he rising and appeared groggy. Warming to his work he did his best, only to lose a game battle which was credit to both the men.

After winning this fight, Vigny remained in London where he gave a series of fencing and self-defence exhibitions including several organised by E.W. Barton-Wright.  Vigny later became the Chief Instructor at Barton-Wright’s Bartitsu Academy of Arms and Physical Culture, where he taught savate and walking stick defence.

Posted in Boxing, Canonical Bartitsu, Savate | Comments Off on “Victory of the Foreigner”: Pierre Vigny vs. Professor Perkins (May, 1899)

Who Was the Bartitsu Club’s Mysterious “Instructor Hubert”?

  • Originally published on the Bartitsu.org site on Friday, 1st September 2017
The Bartitsu Club instructor known only as “Hubert” demonstrates the Front Guard of Vigny stick fighting.

The roster of instructors at E.W. Barton-Wright’s Bartitsu School of Arms included Pierre Vigny (savate and walking stick defence), Yukio Tani and Sadakazu Uyenishi (jiujitsu), Armand Cherpillod (wrestling and physical culture), Captain Alfred Hutton (fencing) and Kate Behnke (calisthenics and breathing exercises).

An anonymous feature article on the Bartitsu Club appearing in the Black and White Budget magazine of December, 1900, however, introduces a seventh instructor, named only as “Hubert”.  Hubert is also shown in two of the photographs illustrating that article, partnering Vigny in demonstrating boxing/savate and stick fighting techniques.

While the Black and White Budget feature is the only known source that directly refers to Hubert, he may have been obliquely referred to in an article from The Sketch of April, 1901.  The author of Defence Against “Hooligans”: Bartitsu Methods in London writes that:

The Bartitsu Club, through its Professors, over whom Mr. Barton-Wright keeps an admonishing eye, guarantees you against all danger. In one corner is M. Vigny, the World’s Champion with the single-stick: the Champion who is the acknowledged master of savate trains his pupils in another.

Given that most sources list Vigny himself as the Club’s savate instructor, it’s possible that Hubert was still teaching savate there in April, 1901.

Research suggests that this mystery instructor may well have been Hubert Desruelles, a young former student of Parisian savate master Charles Charlemont.  The best evidence lies in comparing these two pictures, the first showing “Hubert” boxing with Vigny in 1900:

… and the second showing Hubert Desruelles in 1910:

Although not conclusive, the physical resemblance is striking.

Along with his brother Jean, Hubert Desruelles was active in French savate and boxing circles during the early 20th century, and the brothers ran their own savate academies in Lille and Robaix from circa 1900 – 1914.  Given his infrequent appearance in Bartitsu-related media, it may be that Hubert joined the Bartitsu Club staff on a temporary and/or casual basis during a visit to London.

Sadly, the athletic career of Hubert Desruelles – who had once held the title of French champion at the English style of boxing – was cut short when he was badly wounded in both arms during the First World War.

Posted in Bartitsu School of Arms, Biography, Canonical Bartitsu, Savate, Vigny stick fighting | Comments Off on Who Was the Bartitsu Club’s Mysterious “Instructor Hubert”?